Charles Moore’s thoughts on the week
We all know about spin in theory, but we are slow to notice it in practice. The approved version of the release of Gillian Gibbons, the ‘teddy bear’ teacher in the Sudan, is that the Sudanese government has seen reason thanks to the mission of two Muslim peers, Lord Ahmed and Lady Warsi. But is that so? Is it likely that the Sudanese government had no hand in the original, preposterous charge against her, and did not plan the game which followed? Is it credible that the demonstration calling for fiercer punishment for Ms Gibbons was not approved by the government? Was there any real concession in releasing Ms Gibbons after eight days rather than 15? Lord Ahmed is highly sympathetic to Islamist views. In 2005, for example, he hosted the book launch of an extreme anti-Semite in the House of Lords. Lady Warsi (see last week’s Notes) opposes Muslim moderates because they are ‘off the map’.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in