Mike Jakeman

The slippery stuff of slime: should we loathe it so much?

Our instinctive reaction is disgust, says Susanne Wedlich – but the slimy top layers of oceans and soil importantly cover most of the Earth’s surface

An aerial view of the Sea of Marmara shows mucilage, a jelly-like layer of slime — or ‘sea snot’ — caused by an excessive proliferation of phytoplankton. [Getty Images] 
issue 13 November 2021

As humans, we are supposed to have an aversion to slime. It should repel us. Objects and organisms that might be harmful trigger feelings of disgust which keep us away. And, according to the biologist Susanne Wedlich, the common denominator of ‘wide-ranging microbial threats, covering sickness, sex, death and putrefaction’ is their sliminess. It is easy to test this theory. Google ‘slime moulds’ and note your first response. They are gross.

But these organisms are worth sticking with. Japanese researchers once conducted an experiment using a slime mould and a map of the country. They put the mould on top of Tokyo and dropped food on to the city’s surrounding towns. A little while later the mould had left a trail that closely replicated the city’s underground system. It had figured out the same efficient way to travel as the city’s planners.

Slime is found in the most extreme habitats: hot springs, icebergs, active volcanoes and radioactive water

Disgust is a blunt instrument, however, designed only to keep us safe.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in