James Ball

The Russia report proves it – Britain’s spies have failed

As the long-overdue intelligence and security committee report into Russian interference in the UK is finally published – after a needless and politicised delay – most eyes are (rightly) focused on claims around Brexit, Russian infiltration of the British establishment and killings on UK soil.

But there’s a section of the report that, while less immediately startling, must not be missed and it comes as the report discusses potential threats to UK elections, referendums and our broader political process.

There’s some reassurance in the fact that our low-tech election system, which is still primarily based on manually counting paper ballots marked by pencil (or pens, if you bring your own), is remarkably hard to hack directly.

There are no shortage of concerns around disinformation operations during such votes, though: the use of strategically hacked and leaked information to disrupt news cycles; so-called ‘bot’ accounts on social media that spread messages, memes, division and harassment; and the use of propaganda channels such as RT.

It is not hard to see why no-one would want the brief on electoral interference

The problem for the committee when it tried to gauge these issues was that the intelligence agencies had simply not looked into them.

Written by
James Ball
James Ball is the Global Editor of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which last month launched a two-year project looking into Russian infiltration of the UK elite and in London’s role in enabling overseas corruption

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in