Peter Jones

The Romans wouldn’t have understood our exam obsession

[iStock] 
issue 29 August 2020

Many commentators have argued that the recent grading controversy indicates just how important public examinations are. Up to a point, Lord Copper.

Romans did jobs, not ‘education’. Most who went to school (there was no state provision) probably learnt not much more than the basic three Rs (peasant families — the majority of the population — needed their children to work the land). A freed slave in Petronius’s Satyricon boasts that he knows ‘no geometry or fancy criticism or any such meaningless drivel, but I do know the alphabet and I can work out percentages and measures and currency’; Horace mocked pupils for being asked what is left from 1/12th subtracted from 5/12ths.

One option for children was to be sent away as apprentices. That required no fees: they paid their way by the work they did around the shop, though parents were asked for help with food and clothing.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in