Everyone agrees the Grenfell Tower disaster must usher in a new era of social housing in the UK. The danger is that it sends us back to a very old era, when the council owned, managed and controlled community housing.
There is another way forward, one which meets the rightful sense of injustice felt by people living on Lancaster West, the estate where Grenfell Tower stands – not the injustice of a botched refurbishment which (probably) caused the tragedy, but the injustice of residents not being listened to when they raised concerns, over many years, about their safety or quality of life.
For decades – indeed, since 1974 when the tower was built despite growing evidence that most families didn’t like high-rises, and designs like Lancaster West created ghettos – the estate was treated like a feudal demesne. It was the property of the local seigneur, the council, which was sometimes competent, sometimes generous (with the people’s own money), but often neither, and always absolutely in charge.
It is worth reflecting on what would have happened if, like many apartment blocks around London, Grenfell Tower had been privately owned by the people who lived in it.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in