It’s very telling that, in a debate earlier this week, Christine O’Donnell seemed not to know that the separation of church was in the Constitution.
The wider point is that the religious right, which underlies the Tea Party movement (as a recent study shows), is built on a skewed version of American history. It depends on the pretence that the nation was originally, and is naturally, a theocracy. It claims that, as in ancient Israel, or a Muslim state, religious law is the rightful basis of politics. This was the ideology of the Calvinists who came over in the Mayflower. But this vision was rejected by the nation’s founders, who were various sorts of liberal Protestant. They daringly created a more-or-less new phenomenon: secular political space.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in