Marcus Solarz Hendriks

The questions that need answering on the Chagos Islands deal

The Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean sits halfway between Africa and Indonesia (Alamy)

The art of policymaking is to chart a course through evolving circumstances. In the face of resistance, there are three options: resist and persevere in kind, adjust, or fold and abandon ship. The best policymakers make the correct decision at the right time. The British government is in such a moment with its attempt to cede the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. For months, it has elected the first option – even as the new Mauritian government rejected the terms of the original deal, and Donald Trump’s election victory promises to usher in an administration with dim views of the agreement. As the Chagossians condemned their exclusion from the negotiations, and Maldivian opposition exposed broad regional unease, one by one the arguments in favour collapsed.

The Chagos Islands remain our sovereign territory

Finally, the UK has rejected resistance and switched to adjustment. Yesterday, the Prime Minister’s spokesman confirmed that the government would now await the incoming American President’s blessing before finalising the deal.

Written by
Marcus Solarz Hendriks

Marcus Solarz Hendriks is Head of the National Security Unit at Policy Exchange. He is the co-author of the Policy Exchange report, 'Averting a Strategic Misstep: Why the Government should way away from its draft agreement to cede the Chagos Islands to Mauritius'.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in