Over this summer you can see Swan Lake performed at the Royal Opera House by the Royal Ballet; at the Coliseum by a company from Georgia; at Sadler’s Wells by Chinese acrobats; and at the Royal Albert Hall by English National Ballet. It is expected therefore to attract audiences of Taylor Swiftian magnitude – well in excess of 100,000, by my very rough reckoning. And should you dread autumnal withdrawal symptoms, then fear not: a film of Matthew Bourne’s version will be shown in cinemas in September, prior to a national live tour starting in November and continuing until May, including a two-month season at Sadler’s Wells over Christmas.
There isn’t a hint of Magic Mike erotic tease about this: we never see any genitals
What is the basis of this ballet’s appeal, which seems to have grown over the last century to the point at which it has become for many the art form’s defining image, as well as fail-safe at the box office? It’s certainly not a flawless masterpiece. However it is framed or trimmed, the plot is an absurd muddle, full of unanswered questions and gaping holes. How, for starters, to explain the motivation or nature of Baron Von Rothbart: why does he turn himself into an owl after dark, and why has he got it in for Odette? It is Tchaikovsky’s score with its palpitating themes and thunderous cadences that holds it all together, along with the poetry of the first lakeside act that preserves what survives of Lev Ivanov’s 1895 choreography. Dump the rest and nothing of great aesthetic or historic value would be lost, as Balanchine realised when he presented his Swan Lake in truncated form.
English National Ballet has revived Derek Deane’s staging, designed to fill the Albert Hall’s arena floor and now getting on for 30 years old.
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in