Jawad Iqbal Jawad Iqbal

The pointless spectacle of the pro-Palestine march

(Credit: Getty images)

Now that Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, has defied calls to ban a pro-Palestinian march through London on Armistice Day, attention inevitably turns to what might happen on the day itself. Will there be violence? Could groups intent on causing mayhem splinter from the main protest? Will counter-protesters clash with pro-Palestinian demonstrators? How will the police maintain control of events on the ground and ensure the protest passes off peacefully? 

Well down the list of questions and issues is Israel’s military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, ostensibly the reason for this weekend’s public protests. That is revealing in itself: the actual conflict is almost a side show in the angry claims and counter claims about whether the London protests should take place.

So what exactly is the point of these demonstrations then? What have they achieved beyond sowing conflict and strife? A sensible approach would have been for the organisers to agree – as a mark of respect for Armistice Day – to postpone their march this weekend.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in