The new Civ is gorgeous and richly rewarding

It has been nearly ten years since addicts of the empire-building simulator Civilization – or Civ, as players call it – have had a fresh fix. Was it the original Civ that cost you a first in your finals? It’s back, and this time round it aims to cost you a promotion at work. You’ve both grown up. Prepare to lose very many hours to its attractive blend of diplomacy, resource management, city-building and strategic ultraviolence. 

Most popular

Freddy Gray

The cruellest thing about Trump vs Zelensky? Trump’s right

Paul Wood

I was convinced by the cholesterol sceptics

Sam Olsen

Why Trump doesn’t see Putin as a real threat

Your path through history comes in three linked chunks: you’ll play through the ancient world, then carry forward some of your progress into the age of exploration, and then do the same again in modernity. What’s more, your leaders no longer have to be historically or geographically appropriate. If you want to set Benjamin Franklin on a hostile takeover of Confucian China, now’s your chance. Level him up quick and get a buff from those bifocals. 

I asked Harriet Tubman to build an empire in ancient Egypt. Regrettably, she turned out to be useless as pharaohs go. She was wiped out by the neighbouring tribes long before she got round to building any pyramids. Diversity hire, amirite? I had a bit more luck plonking Xerxes into ancient Persia. Before long we were descending on our neighbours like the wolf on the proverbial fold, and soon Nineveh and Tyre were, well, one with Nineveh and Tyre.

The graphics are gorgeous – rivers, mountains and valleys open out tile by tile as your scouts explore – and the gameplay is rich and various and outstandingly one-more-try-ish. Its whiggish premise that humanity moves, as a rule, from barbarism to civilisation rather than in the opposite direction looks increasingly quaint.