Harry Mount

The National Trust is spoiling beautiful places in the name of people who’ll never visit them

It’s time to take a stand against the absurd, patronising drive for ‘accessibility’

issue 15 November 2014

Broadhaven Beach in Pembrokeshire was once a sublime combination of the works of nature and man. The broad, deep, sandy bay is flanked by towering limestone cliffs. Two hundred years ago, a stream leading to the sea was dammed by Lord Cawdor, the then owner, to form the Bosherston Lily Ponds.

Enter the National Trust, owners of the estate since 1976. Now the spot where the lakes meet the sea is marked with a bright purple National Trust sign, saying,

Return to the start,
a new path you’ll take
Its rocky in places,
don’t fall in the lake.


Perhaps it’s better in the Welsh translation, also featured on the purple sign. Dear God, I hope it’s more literate.

The sign sums up all that’s terrible about the National Trust — and our libraries, museums and galleries. They are being infantilised by the zealous crusade to make them accessible to people who don’t want to go there.

There are more than four million National Trust members: by far the biggest institution of its kind in the world.

Written by
Harry Mount

Harry Mount is editor of The Oldie and author of How England Made the English (Penguin) and Et Tu, Brute? The Best Latin Lines Ever (Bloomsbury)

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in