Philip Hensher

The naming of cats

It took a long time for cats to gain the same serious status as dogs, but by the 18th century they were starting to have personalities, says Kathryn Hughes

A drawing by Edward Lear of his cat Foss. [Getty Images] 
issue 27 April 2024

All sorts of animals have been kept as pets over the centuries. We know of sparrows in Catullus and John Skelton. There is a badger with a collar in a fresco by Signorelli – probably not much more biddable than the lobster Gerard de Nerval supposedly took for walks in Paris. The word ‘puss’ seems not to have referred to cats before the late 19th century but to hares, either a pet one (William Cowper had three, of whom Puss was sweet-natured and Tiney ‘the surliest of his kind’), or one being hunted in Surtees. Dogs always occupied a special place, with names and a position in the household.

Cats were more marginal, accepted for their useful function of mousing but only gradually being awarded a position of affection. Montaigne wondered if his cat (not naming it) was playing with him as much as he with her. By the 18th century, cats had names and personalities.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in