Rachel Sylvester is on top form in the Times today, and I’d urge CoffeeHousers to
delve behind the paywall (or borrow someone’s copy of the paper) to read her column. Its
central point? That ministers are discovering ingenious ways to exploit and undermine the ringfenced health and international development budgets. The Home Office is saying that drug
rehab programmes should fall under health spending. The Foreign Office is trying to pass off some of their spending as development, and so on. And, crucially, the Treasury seems to be
going along with it:
As Sylvester says, there’s something “absurd” about all this. After all, the government could have reached the same result by not ringfencing health and international development, and giving the other departments more money to spend on their current responsibilities. But it also opens questions about intra-coalition relations.“The Treasury seems to be tacitly endorsing this approach, with officials emphasising that departmental boundaries are artificial.”
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in