P. F. King

The long arm of police corruption

Tom Harper exposes deep-grained criminality at the Met, including actively assisting violent offenders and stealing thousands from the public purse

Doreen Lawrence, with a photograph of her murdered son Stephen. The Met’s shambolic investigation of the crime continues to cause outrage. [Alamy] 
issue 19 November 2022

Are all institutions basically corrupt? If company directors snaffle pencils from the stationery cupboard for their own use, are they corrupt? Is there a sliding scale of corruption, from ‘whatever’, through to ‘well I wouldn’t do it myself’, all the way to ‘summon the rozzers’? And does it matter what the organisation is? Is it worse to steal from your employer if you work for Nestlé or for Oxfam? Are some small corruptions are basically all right?

‘Don’t look now, but I think we’re not being followed.’

Of course if we accept the small corruptions, the bigger ones creep in at the edges. And once they’ve entered an organisation’s culture, it is well nigh impossible to root them out. In essence, Tom Harper’s book is a thoroughly depressing account of the Metropolitan Police’s corruptibility. It’s an organisation that matters, whether you like it or not, and one whose employees have at various stages passed beyond pilfering the store cupboard to turning a blind eye to murder, actively assisting violent criminals and stealing many thousands of pounds of public money.

Armed robberies are not investigated, criminal cases peter out, and the whole edifice begins to look shady

There’s a peculiarly British sort of corruption that explains all kinds of odd things: the Libor exchange rate, hedge funds and of course the extraordinary number of old Etonians in public life.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in