Pierre d’Alancaisez

The latest Venice Biennale is ideologically and aesthetically bankrupt 

The abdication of aesthetic criteria in favour of a 'decolonial' organising principle is a wholly inadequate rationale for presenting contemporary art

Contemporary art has rendered itself obsolete at the latest Venice Biennale. Credit: Matteo De Mayda 
issue 27 April 2024

Last week’s opening of the 60th edition of the Venice Biennale marks a watershed for the art world. In much of the festival’s gigantic central exhibition, curated by the Brazilian museum director Adriano Pedrosa, as well as in many of the dozens of independently organised national pavilions and countless collateral events, it more obviously than ever before didn’t so much matter what was on show, but why. The politics of visibility and representation has been eating away at the arts for at least a decade, most recently under the banner of ‘decolonisation’. The now nearly complete abdication of aesthetic criteria in favour of a decolonial organising principle is here finally exposed as a wholly inadequate rationale for presenting contemporary art.

Art will allow the exoticisation of foreigners – if you cloak it in faux concern with migration

Foreigners Everywhere, the title of Pedrosa’s project, encapsulates this failing proposition. The cheap pun greets visitors in multilingual neon at the exhibition’s entrance (a 2004 work by the artist duo Claire Fontaine).

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in