Rory Sutherland Rory Sutherland

The importance of selective inefficiency

You can judge a business by the things it does that aren't strictly necessary

The modern day baker's dozen: Five Guys' fries with a side of fries (Photo: L Twynam) 
issue 23 May 2015

Readers of a certain age may remember choosing a cassette player in the 1980s. In theory the process was simple: we would have read reviews of competing devices in audiophile publications and then bought whichever device scored best in terms of sound quality, reliability and value for money.

Except we didn’t do this, did we? We went into Comet, looked at three or four examples we considered most attractive, and then pressed the ‘eject’ button on each of them. Invariably we bought the cassette player with the most elegant eject action. If it gracefully whirred open with a sweet damping movement, that was a clincher. Any device in which the cassette holder lunged open with a ‘clack’ was rejected as manifestly rubbish.

To understand this, you need to study the Kano Model, from Professor Noriaki Kano at the Tokyo University of Science.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in