Chloë Ashby

The haunting power of 17th-century Dutch art

Too often dismissed as leaden or trivial, Dutch art is a ‘fathomless world, with a strangeness to arouse and disturb’, says Laura Cumming

‘The Goldfinch’, by Carel Fabritius. [Getty Images] 
issue 01 July 2023

Laura Cumming writes about art with a painter’s precision. She’s been the chief art critic for the Observer since 1999. Her fourth work of non-fiction, Thunderclap, is a beautifully illustrated memoir that intertwines biography, visual analysis and personal reflection. An eloquent homage to her artist father, James Cumming, and to the artists of the Dutch golden age, it explores the power of pictures in life and in death.

Dutch art is less about things and the way they look, and more about feeling, mood, charisma

Dutch art is a culture like no other, writes Cumming. ‘Which other nation wanted to portray all of itself in this way, its food and drink and physical conditions, its lovers, its doctors, housewives and drunks?’ Freed from Spanish Catholic rule after 80 years of warfare, the newly independent Dutch Republic emerged in the mid-17th century with a cultural boom: between 1.3 and 1.4 million paintings were produced by up to 700 painters in under two decades.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in