Peter Hoskin

The Gurkha ruling is shameful

Over the past few weeks, three Gurkha veterans have been challenging the Government’s imbalanced pension plan for Gurkhas – by which those who signed up for the army before July 1997, and retired after that date, are valued at between only 24 and 36 percent of British rates.  Today, the High Court turned their challenge down

It’s a shameful ruling.  After all, these three veterans – and the group they represent – were just as prepared to sacrifice their lives for our country as any other soldier.  By that alone, they have done more for the UK than most people ever will.  And that’s before we get onto the Gurkha’s proud 200-year history, or the 13 Victoria crosses they’ve accrued in that time.

In turn, the UK should reward them accordingly.  And that means not turning down their pension requests with the cry that they’ll be “unaffordable” for the public finances.  Given that Gurkha’s pensions currently cost around £40 million a year, we’re talking peanuts by state standards. 

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in