Lloyd Evans Lloyd Evans

The Guardian didn’t much like Noel Coward’s Relative Values – but you will

Plus: a play about paedo-paranoia that implodes under the weight of its internal contradictions

Dazzling: Patricia Hodge, Caroline Quentin and Rory Bremner in ‘Relative Values’ [Getty Images/Shutterstock/iStock/Alamy] 
issue 03 May 2014

Cripes. How did I get that one wrong? A few issues back I blithely predicted that Harry Hill’s musical I Can’t Sing would run for three years. It closes this month, so I’m a little reluctant to praise another glittering comedy, Relative Values by Noël Coward, which, like Hill’s stricken satire, has received a few snubs from the critics.

In his early dramas, Coward portrayed servants as amiable bunglers or bossy cynics and he rarely gave them more than one wisecrack per act. In Hay Fever, for example, the leading lady can’t even recall the housekeeper’s name, and her forgetfulness is supposed to be funny and attractive. Relative Values dates from 1951, when domestic service was in decline and social divisions were being steam-rollered flat. Coward’s response was to write a play in which the servants are fully realised characters who offer their employers shrewd advice and emotional support. It’s a fascinating slice of social history that shows the poshest of the posh grappling with the death of pedigree.

We meet an aristocratic clan whose heir is about to marry an upstart film star, Miranda, who has an elder sister, Moxie, whom she hasn’t seen for years. And Moxie happens to be the personal maid of the family matriarch, Lady Felicity. This device gives Moxie dual nationality: she’s a lowly servant but she’s also about to become kin to a family of earls. The anxieties pile up as the aristocrats, who are all witty and sophisticated sweethearts, caper around trying to deal with the coming earthquake.

The script does take some time to get its engines started. Half an hour is wasted on a plot twist that comes to nothing but finally, in Act III, the trap is set and the fun begins.

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in