Damian Thompson Damian Thompson

The greatest female composer you’ve never heard of

Liszt hailed Marie Jaëll's Second Piano Concerto as ‘a brilliant masterpiece'

The Bru Zane portrait album devoted to Marie Jaëll  
issue 10 June 2023

One of the most intriguing piano concertos of the late 19th century is unknown to the public – and no wonder: so far as I can work out, it has only been recorded once, on a speciality label devoted to neglected French repertoire. As I write this, there are only 11 copies available from Amazon and I recommend that you grab one quickly, because the Second Piano Concerto of Marie Jaëll (1846-1925) demands repeated listening.

If you want proof women of the era could move beyond well-carpentered clichés, listen to Marie Jaëll

The concerto’s harmonic language is superficially conventional: sweeping tunes decorated by arm-swinging arpeggios. But the melodies are lopsided and from time to time the soloist’s butterfly textures are reduced to single notes on which the finger lingers defiantly, exploring every possibility of touch.

The relationship between the pianist’s body and the keyboard was Jaëll’s lifelong obsession. In 1894, ten years after Liszt himself hailed her concerto as ‘a brilliant masterpiece’, she abandoned composition permanently to work on her whole-body ‘Method’ of playing the piano. This is based on the notion – not easy to get your head round – that the touch on the key relates to movement in the same way that vision depends on light. Jaëll, a young widow from Alsace, believed with religious passion that the production of sound can boost our capacity to acquire knowledge of the universe. Finger movements ‘become artistic only if their image pre-exists in the brain’, she wrote.

Jaëll’s biographer Catherine Guichard argues that she anticipated the discoveries of 21st-century neuroscience; also, less convincingly, that ‘in spirit, Marie Jaëll was close to quantum physicists’. (French scholars can’t resist this analogy, despite the famous Sokal hoax in which a physicist humiliated a postmodern journal by publishing an attack on scientific objectivity based on deliberate nonsense about ‘quantum gravity’.

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in