Philip Hensher

The genuine polymath is still one in a million

Despite the ease of modern research, few can ever hope to rival the deep, varied learning of Leonardo or Goethe

Self-portrait by Leonardo da Vinci. Credit: Getty Images 
issue 16 May 2020

We live at a time of universal polymathy. We don’t know everything, but there’s not much difficulty in being able to discover any given truth. But it’s worth remembering just how hard it used to be to find things out. Thirty years ago if you wanted to research off your own bat it meant a trip to the public library — and perhaps filling out a form for an inter-library loan. Or you could try your luck in a bookshop, new or secondhand. The whole process took a long time, and most people stayed within their professional competence or enthusiasm, frankly admitting to ignorance outside those limits. It was the age of the specialist, memorably captured by Michael Frayn in Donkeys’ Years and the character of Kenneth Snell:

Take me, for instance. I’m working on parasitic infestation of the small intestine. Now, I can trace my path into the small intestine.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in