Martin Gayford

The ex factor | 22 November 2018

Plus: Richard Pousette-Dart has also been relegated to the league of art-historical also-rans but his early work was as good as Pollock’s

issue 24 November 2018

It is easy to assume that the contours of art history are unchanging, its major landmarks fixed for ever. Actually, like all histories it is a matter of shifting perspectives. As we move through time, the view backwards constantly alters.

The rising and falling critical estimations of the painter Richard Smith are a case in point. Had you asked an art-world insider in 1963 who the brightest rising star of British art was there is a strong chance — though other names such as David Hockney might have been mentioned — that the answer would have been Smith (1931–2016).

Appropriately, 1963 is the end date of an excellent little show at Hazlitt Holland-Hibbert gallery. This collates many of the most impressive pictures from Smith’s earliest and most seductive period. At that time he was working in a fluid boundary zone between what was later termed ‘colour field abstraction’ and what was about to be dubbed ‘pop art’.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in