One of the pleasures of fiction, be it book or film, is that it can take us to actual places beyond our own national boundaries – and into other worlds which don’t exist. Think of fictional states from Narnia to (Graham) Greeneland – and Richard Curtis’ London, that parallel version of our capital seen in Four Weddings and a Funeral, Notting Hill and Love Actually, where no one has ever seen a machete and swearing is only ever done in a jolly way. When I asked on social media for suggestions as to what this world might be called, I was inundated with suggestions. Curtistan, Curtopia, Notting Shill, Notting Swill, Treacletown and Englandland were among the non-obscene ones; my husband then weighed in with Smarming, Tweeford and – my favourite – Smarming-on-Twee.
It’s a desiccated England-land Disney-world by and for people who feel fear and loathing for their countrymen who do weird unpredictable things like desiring national sovereignty
Why do critics loathe this maker of apparently inoffensive films so much? And why does the prospect of an ABC News special reuniting the stars of Love Actually two decades later (including Hugh Grant, Emma Thompson, Bill Nighy and Curtis himself, plus a message from Martine ‘The Queen’ McCutcheon) turn otherwise civilised people into furious bundles of F-bombing? The one-hour special The Laughter & Secrets of Love Actually ‘will look at how the film became a beloved Christmas

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in