Rory Sutherland Rory Sutherland

The economic case for flexible working

iStock 
issue 11 September 2021

Is flexible working better or worse for productivity? What is the correct blend of remote and office work? Billions of once-healthy pixels will die in the conduct of this debate. But is it possible that we are asking the wrong question entirely?

Instead of asking the proximate question ‘Do we want our employees to work remotely?’, businesses should perhaps be asking: ‘Are we ultimately better off if consumers can work remotely?’ If you are Pret, the Duke of Westminster or Southeastern trains, the answer is possibly no. For almost everyone else, however, the answer is a loud yes.

Having richer, more leisured customers is just as valuable as having more productive employees

There is a tendency among the more moronic type of business to resist any concession to the quality of life of their employees; anything that seems like an ‘easy option’ is treated with suspicion. But this rigidity is itself profoundly anti–market — if, that is, you define the proper function of free markets as a continuous creative process of unearthing new voluntary arrangements of mutual benefit to two or more parties.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in