At the worst moment in Labour party fortunes, some point in the mid-1980s, a Labour politician is said to have emerged from yet another resounding election defeat unrepentant, declaring: there must be no compromise with the electorate.
There was something admirable about this remark. The politician who uttered the phrase had doubtless entered politics to espouse the causes he or she passionately believed in — socialism in one country, nuclear disarmament, ownership of the means of production, etc. The fact that the complacent and inert masses of the British people refused to entertain these Marxist insights was no reason to think again.
This state of mind was not conducive to political success. There are analogies with the Conservative party since its landslide defeat in 1997. In the various leadership elections that have taken place since, the Conservative party has made it an iron rule to choose the candidate who had most appeal among party members rather than the despised general population.
In this year’s election, the Conservatives find themselves in the same predicament, only more so.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in