Tom Goodenough Tom Goodenough

The conclusion to the Ken Livingstone debacle will please no one

Perhaps the most remarkable thing about Ken Livingstone’s resignation statement is that he finally managed to avoid saying the word that got him into so much trouble in the first place. The former mayor of London said that with ‘great sadness’ he was cutting up his party membership card because ‘the ongoing issues around my suspension from the Labour Party have become a distraction from the key political issue of our time’.

Livingstone’s decision to renounce his membership brings to an end his suspension from the party of more than two years, which came about after he suggested in 2016 that Hitler was a zionist. But while the row is now, in a sense, concluded, this is an outcome that will please no one. Ken has been allowed to quit the party on his own terms. And while he did say sorry that his ‘historical argument’ had ‘caused offence’ there was little else in the way of contrition, with Livingstone refusing to even accept that he had brought his party into disrepute. 

Instead, Livingstone made it clear that his decision to leave Labour is because he realised something much more important: that he has become a distraction to the bigger prize of getting Jeremy Corbyn to Downing Street. 

Livingstone went on to say that he had realised that the investigation into his comments could ‘drag on for months or even years, distracting attention from Jeremy’s policies’. Of course, this says little for the Labour party’s ability to deal quickly with complaints like this in the future.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in