The coalition’s plan for moving claimants off Incapacity Benefit and into work is, at
heart, an admirable one. For too long, IB has been used a political implement for massaging the overall unemployment figures, and it has allowed thousands of people to wrongly stay unemployed
at the taxpayers’ expense. There is, quite simply, a moral and economic case for reform.
But that doesn’t mean that Professor Paul Gregg’s comments in the Times today should be ignored. Gregg is one of
the architects of the current system for moving claimants off IB, and he raises stark concerns about how that system is currently operating. The main problem, he says, is the medical test for
determining who, and who doesn’t, deserve the benefit. As the Times puts it:
“…thousands of vulnerable people with terminal cancer, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and clinical depression have had their applications rejected and told to look for work … about 8,000 people a month are now challenging the decision at an employment tribunal and almost half are winning cases.”
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in