Italian intellectuals, Cambodian peasants, Hungarian workers, Russian colonels, Angolan insurgents, French philosophes, American actors, British miners, Chinese craftsmen, Nicaraguan labourers: over the years, the adherents of the international communist movement have been so geographically and socially diverse as to defy classification. During the 100-odd years of the movement’s existence, nations as different as Czarist Russia, semi-feudal China and post- colonial Cuba subsequently developed into communist states. Marxist literature has been translated into hundreds of languages and read, by somebody, in all of them.
Perhaps as a result of this diversity, the literature on the international communist movement is stunningly weak. Though communism was of central importance to the 20th century, international chroniclers have too often adopted the turgid bureaucratic language of their protagonists, too easily become bogged down by the ideological squabbles they are trying to des- cribe, and were too frequently tempted to focus on one country, usually Russia, to the exclusion of others, especially those in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in