James Forsyth James Forsyth

The Blair–Bush dilemma: is a nuclear Iran an acceptable price for a stable Iraq?

The Blair–Bush dilemma: is a nuclear Iran an acceptable price for a stable Iraq?

issue 18 November 2006

Tony Blair’s speech at the Guildhall adroitly placed him ahead of the news. By reiterating his support for dialogue with Iran and Syria on the same day that George W. Bush met James Baker’s Iraq Study Group, he has guaranteed himself some of the plaudits if and when Washington finally — and formally — talks to Tehran.

It is credit that Washington is happy for Blair to take. His appearance, largely for appearance’s sake, before the Study Group on Tuesday shows just how much more sensitive the Americans have become to Blair’s domestic plight. Long gone are the days when Dick Cheney, with a breathtaking ignorance of the realities of British politics, muttered that the administration shouldn’t fret too much about Blair being forced from office as Iain Duncan Smith would make a more congenial ally. One effect of Blair’s falling popularity, reinforced by the failed September putsch against him, has been to awaken the American foreign policy establishment to how close the United States was to losing Britain.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in