Julian Brazier

The Army is obsessed with safety

A soldier of the United Kingdom's 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian infantry unit storms an enemy position in a training exercise (Getty Images)

Last week, the new head of the Army, General Sir Roly Walker, warned that war may be much closer than we think. Is our military ready? Two years ago, a syndicate of young officers published an article on the extreme shortage of division and brigade-level training in the British Army. Since then, the amount of larger-scale training has improved somewhat, despite a general resource shortage, but a form-filling safety regime has developed in our armed forces in the past decade which makes our army less combat ready.

It’s worth first understanding how safety works in the British Army. In recent years, several fatal accidents have been reported in its operations. Statistics are no comfort to a grieving family, but, since withdrawal from Afghanistan, the armed forces have become a significantly safer environment than the civilian world. Service personnel are 56 per cent less likely to die each year than their civilian peers.

The armed forces are subject to the same health and safety legislation as businesses (except where the Secretary of State explicitly waives it) but there cannot normally be criminal prosecutions when accidents occur.

Written by
Julian Brazier

Julian Brazer is a fellow of the Royal United Services Institute. He was a Conservative MP from 1987 to 2017. He served as the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Reserves from 2014 to 2016.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in