I never thought I would write this but Sarah Palin had a point when she said that she
was a victim of a “blood libel”. The Left has gone wild and criticised her for implying she was on the receiving end of murderous anti-Semitism – the blood libel is the
allegation that Jews delighted in murdering Christians. (For a modern example of the lie that has launched a thousand pogroms readers should note the Liberal Democrat peer Jenny Tonge’s
call for an inquiry into invented allegations that Jewish doctors
were harvesting the organs of the dead and injured of the Haitian earthquake.) With equal force, her critics have also accused Palin of making the Arizona murders “all about me”.
She meant us to attend to her pain rather than the pain of the bereaved.
But strictly speaking she was right. To date there is no evidence that Palin, the Tea Party or Fox News inspired the killer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in