Ross Clark Ross Clark

Thames Water isn’t solely to blame for the South’s dirty rivers

Credit: Getty images

Few will, or should, feel sympathy for Thames Water being fined 9 per cent of its annual turnover for fouling rivers through sewage discharges. Water regulator Ofwat found numerous failings with maintenance and a lack of investment, which resulted in sewage discharges becoming a routine event rather than an emergency response to heavy rainfall.

The volume of water which has to be handled by the storm drains is increasing

Thames Water has been under-investing for years, preferring to spend its profits on dividends for its private equity shareholders. What has happened with the rivers is an advert neither for Thames Water’s business ethics nor for privatisation of the water industry. What might have seemed to have worked when water companies were public companies quoted on the stock exchange and invested in by UK pension funds, among others, became a lot less satisfactory when they were taken over by overseas private equity, which chose to sweat assets rather than invest – always counting on tapping water customers (who are entrapped by water companies’ monopolies) to bail them out.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in