The Spectator

Taxing questions

The Spectator on the government's fiscal policy

issue 30 August 2008

Demoralised Labour backbenchers, watching helplessly as their government disintegrates and the prospect of electoral humiliation looms, have at last found a cause to which they can rally: higher taxes on the ‘super-rich’, both private and corporate.

In the first of those categories, the target is anyone with an annual income of £250,000 or more. In the second category, the proposal gathering support not only on Labour benches but also in opinion polls is for a windfall tax on utility companies which have jacked up the prices of electricity and gas so dramatically in recent months, blaming soaring wholesale energy markets, yet still have the gall to announce handsome profits.

Behind this bandwagon — currently driven by the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee — are two impulses. The first is an old-fashioned socialist urge to penalise the allegedly undeserving rich and lash out at the perceived evils of capitalism — and to use the proceeds to maintain benefits for the poorest segments of society, including, for example, the elderly on fixed incomes who struggle to pay inflated domestic heating bills.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in