Scott Bradfield

Tales of old Hollywood are always entertaining – even when they’re apocryphal

If the early days lacked glamour, they certainly provided the best anecdotes, according to a new oral history

Hedy Lamarr was ‘a very, very beautiful woman to photograph – until she smiled’, said one cinematographer [Alamy] 
issue 10 December 2022

Despite being known as a visually driven town, Hollywood has a rich oral history. This may be due to the fact that it is (like most literary communities) a small, gossipy village in which everybody knows everybody else and what everybody is saying about them. It also testifies to the fact that while Hollywood’s ‘players’ may often produce stupid films, they aren’t actually stupid themselves. Most of the time they know exactly what they’re doing – which is what makes them so perplexing.

According to this hefty book, which assembles more than half a century’s worth of interviews conducted by the American Film Institute, Hollywood’s early days weren’t as glamorous as the later ones, but they certainly seemed a lot more fun. As Henry Hathaway recalled of the early 20th century, after Carl Laemmle established Universal Studios in the San Fernando Valley, the industry attracted bright, restless people who had trouble keeping their jobs:

Everyone who grew up with the industry was well-fuelled with cheap alcohol, even during Prohibition

They were the kind of people who didn’t give a damn if they were broke one day and they drank a lot.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in