Nicholas Lezard

Surreal parables

Even her commas are interesting, says Nick Lezard — and her non-sequiturs may not be non-sequiturs. What’s certain is that she’s an exceptionally original writer

issue 12 November 2016

There is a common assumption that experimental writing — for want of a better term — is obscure, joyless and arid. Or worse: that it is fake (or ‘pseudy’), a deception practised upon either the deluded or gullible reader. So I wonder what people who hold such assumptions would make of this. It constitutes the final paragraph of ‘Specialist’, one of the stories in this collection. The story itself is, not untypically for this book, less than a page long:

The cyclist hit me, and it’s vile after my life ends in the afterlife. Lots of incense, resin, apes and giraffe-tails — all acquired tastes. I don’t like that kind of thing.

Several things may strike you. First, of course, is the breaking of the narrative convention that holds that no first-person narrator can report back from death.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in