Niall Gooch

Stop trying to make ‘weird’ happen

JD Vance (Credit: Getty Images)

Where American left-liberal rhetoric leads, British left-liberal rhetoric invariably follows. Hate speech, reparations, decolonisation, white fragility; there is no intellectual fad so inane that it will not be enthusiastically mimicked, with childlike credulity, by journalists, academics, civil servants and broadcasters, regardless of whether it even makes sense in a British context. The impression you get is of status-conscious provincials seizing, herd-like, on the latest fashions and conventional wisdom from the imperial centre. 

The accusation of weirdness is a striking example of the decline of political rhetoric

So it is that barely a month after the Democrats and their allies in the US media adopted ‘weird’ as their attack line on Republican vice-presidential candidate J.D. Vance, some on this side of the pond are trying their best to make it a term of derision in British politics. The Guardian reports research by the think tank More in Common which allegedly shows that some voters are beginning to regard the Tories as ‘weird’.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in