Martin Vander Weyer Martin Vander Weyer

Spikes and stagnant growth: why we are where we are

Who’s to blame for the imminent recession? This scholarly perspective on the history of interest and credit gives us a good idea

Traders at the New York Stock Exchange on 28 February 2020, a dark day for the markets. [Johannes Eisele/AFP /Getty] 
issue 16 July 2022

We live in discombobulating times, economically speaking. We know we’re descending into the highest inflation for half a century and an almost certain recession. But we don’t know quite how painful it’s going to be and we don’t know how to apportion blame between bad decisions and ‘black swans’. Clearly the coming train crash has something to do with the Covid pandemic and quite a lot to do with the madness of Vladimir Putin. But what if economic prospects had been fundamentally damaged, especially for the most vulnerable, by policy responses to the previous crisis, namely the ultra-low interest rates and money printing deployed after the near collapse of the global banking system in 2008?

That is the question approached by the former investment manager Edward Chancellor in The Price of Time, through a scholarly perspective of the history of interest and credit since their known origins in ancient Mesopotamia. To compress a long story to its essence, the concept of interest for savers can be understood as a reward for abstinence – that is, for deferring consumption to a later date – while the interest received by lenders is reward for the anxiety of not knowing whether their money will ever be repaid.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in