The Spectator

Spectator letters: RT replies, Bristol bristles, and Ross Clark doesn’t (yet) eat his hat

issue 13 December 2014

Moscow writing

Sir: After months of lamentations from western politicians and officials about losing the ‘information war’ to Russia, a former executive editor of Radio Free Europe tries to paint everything Russia Today does in terms of a ‘propaganda’ campaign (‘Moscow calling’, 6 December). If RT is not inherently bad, it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, says John O’Sullivan.

Take the sectarian violence in Libya, and the Syrian rebel groups that have now become Isis. Russia Today was reporting on these issues years before anyone else cared to. According to O’Sullivan’s article, when we cover the hypocrisy of US or European policies it is simply to further RT’s pro-Russian, anti-western agenda. Mass surveillance, drone strikes on civilians, police abuse — according to John O’Sullivan, these are all Russia-favouring stories that are only covered because President Putin orders it.

It is disappointing that an organisation such as The Spectator, whichpurports to advance public debate and democracy, has to resort to such undignified tactics to try and bring down the competition.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in