Martin Gayford

Space odyssey | 14 September 2017

The problem with Tate Britain’s retrospective is it’s cluttered like a stockroom. Some works of art, like some people, need a room to themselves

issue 16 September 2017

Rachel Whiteread is an indefatigable explorer of internal space. By turning humble items such as hot-water bottles and sinks inside out — that is, casting the cavities — Whiteread has accomplished one of the traditional tasks of art: revealing structure, beauty and mystery in the everyday. Her work is a remarkable contribution to an overlooked genre: the sculpture of inanimate things or still-life statuary.

Nonetheless the large-scale, mid-career Whiteread retrospective at Tate Britain, which ought to be a triumph, does not quite come off. Ironically, since her idiom is derived from minimalism, the exhibition fails to observe the law that less is more.

This is a common problem with museum displays of all kinds — people are tempted to show too much — but it is particularly acute with objects that are pared down to a simple essence. A room jam-packed with paintings can look marvellous — depending, of course, on what they are.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in