In the Cameroon effort to redefine the politics of fairness, the benefit cap of
£26,000 a year is key. When George Osborne announced it in his 2010
conference speech, he explained it – rightly – as a matter of fairness that ‘no family on out-of-work benefits will get more than the average family gets by going out to
work’.
The Tories were also aware of just how potent a wedge issue it would be. If Labour opposed the cap, they would be in favour of some households in which no one is working receiving more from the
state than the average salary people achieve by working. This is, to put it mildly, not a position that would go down well on the doorsteps.
But the cap has hit a snag: Simon Hughes. The Lib Dem deputy leader is, The Guardian reports,
saying that he is in favour of a cap in principle but that it is currently set at the wrong level, which is the same position Labour is taking.
James Forsyth
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in