William Astor

Signal failure

High Speed 2 is a costly solution to a problem that will probably never arise

issue 14 January 2012

Rail privatisation by the Major government heralded the largest growth in passenger numbers in decades. This was down to improvements in service and a timetable to suit passengers, coupled with some attractive fare offers. But future growth of rail travel is unlikely to be at the same high rate and there we have the nub of the arguments around High Speed 2. The Department for Transport has been less successful in forecasting passenger growth than Gordon Brown was at forecasting economic growth — and that is saying something.

Britain needs an integrated transport policy that includes road, rail and air, and it needs to address the so-called north-south divide. But Conservatives believe in choice, so users should be able to choose for themselves the most convenient way to travel.

In a recent letter, the British Chambers of Commerce compare the proposed 70 miles of high-speed railway in the United Kingdom to high-speed rail in countries such as Saudi Arabia (342 miles) and Morocco (422 miles).

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in