Charlotte Appleyard breaks the news that Britain’s most controversial artist has been commissioned by the nation’s favourite cathedral
In early November we can expect, if not murder, then certainly uproar in the cathedral, when an ‘important’ new work by Damien Hirst is unveiled. St Paul’s, that great symbol of all that’s best about Britain, is set to play host to an artist many believe represents all that’s worst. Details of the work itself are not available yet — in fact even approaching the staff at St Paul’s provoked mild panic: how had I found out? What did I know? But one thing we can at least be certain about: Damien Hirst is unlikely to break his bonds with controversy. Though even cash-strapped St Paul’s wouldn’t go as far as actual sacrilege, the work is bound to be contentious.
So here is another controversial thought: maybe this isn’t just a bid for cheap publicity, perhaps it’s a courageous commission and an important milestone in the nation’s history of art?
Hirst is not an entirely inappropriate choice for the cathedral.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in