Eliot Wilson Eliot Wilson

Did Axel Rudakubana deserve a harsher sentence?

Axel Rudakubana, 18, shouting from the dock as he appeared at Liverpool Crown Court (Credit: Alamy)

The murder of three young girls in Southport last July by Axel Rudakubana was an act of extreme savagery and calculated evil. Six-year-old Bebe King, seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe and nine-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar were victims not only of a brutal killer but also of a system of policing, intelligence and criminal justice which failed at several points: they did not need to die.

Rudakubana pleaded guilty at the beginning of his trial this week to all sixteen charges against him: three counts of murder, ten of attempted murder, one count of possession of a knife, one of ricin production and one terror-related charge. But he showed no remorse, and had told police after his arrest: “I’m glad those kids are dead, it makes me happy” and that he was “so happy, six years old. It’s a good thing they are dead, yeah.”

The case of Axel Rudakubana has exposed many failures, but his sentencing is not one of them

Mr Justice Goose gave Rudakubana 13 life sentences, with a minimum term of 51 years and 190 days.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in