Sending seized Russian loot to Ukraine is no simple matter

We must be bolder in seizing frozen Russian assets, writes the Prime Minister in a Sunday newspaper. ‘That starts with taking the billions in interest these assets are collecting and sending it to Ukraine.’ Can that really be done? Having consulted international legal opinion, here’s my summary.

The principle of ‘sovereign state immunity’ doesn’t prevent the freezing of state assets, but confiscating them would create a very dangerous precedent, namely that no state’s reserves would be secure in anyone else’s banking system. But in a conflict where the aggressor has clearly breached international law, as Russia has in Ukraine, the wrongfully harmed state has a right to restitution; and the International Court of Justice in The Hague may eventually award compensation in the form of seized loot.

But this war is far from over; Russia will win it if the West fails to fund Ukrainian weaponry; and the politics are complicated. As a substitute for US taxpayers’ money for aid, Congress might willingly pass Ukraine the modest $5 billion or so of Russian assets currently held over there.