The Spectator

Security first

The United Nations is good at passing resolutions. It is, sadly, a little less effective at displaying resolve

issue 12 August 2006

The United Nations is good at passing resolutions. It is, sadly, a little less effective at displaying resolve. As The Spectator went to press, Security Council discussions on the French-inspired resolution designed to deal with the conflict in Lebanon and Israel were dragging on. But whatever form of words the UN settles upon, the actions required by the international community seem to be implicitly understood by the French, the Americans and the British government. What will count in the days ahead is an unshakeable readiness to implement the steps required to provide both Lebanon and Israel with the security they deserve. And that will require the determination to tackle the root cause of instability in the region — the terrorist threat from Islamist groups such as Hezbollah and their sponsors in Tehran and Damascus.

The resolution wisely avoided making glib rhetorical concessions to those who have been demanding an immediate and unconditional ceasefire.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in