Infamously, George Canning and Viscount Castlereagh fought a duel over a policy
disagreement; Iain Duncan Smith and George Osborne will follow suit at this rate. I had thought they’d resolved their differences over the upfront costs of IDS’ welfare
reform; but the Mail on Sunday reports
otherwise, glorying in the glares, savage bon mots and expletives.
This is the conundrum: if IDS doesn’t find £10bn in savings, he will not get the £3bn needed to enact his reforms to make work pay. There is something quite heart-warming about IDS’ fight against the institutionally overbearing Treasury, but George Osborne is right: it is unacceptable to give one department, however well intentioned, carte blanche to keep spending when others face 40 percent cuts.
IDS will find the £10bn, predominantly by cutting middle class benefits. But Dizzy suggests that George Osborne could make additional savings to fund IDS’ welfare reform. The Observer reports

Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in