Lloyd Evans Lloyd Evans

Sam Mendes’s King Lear is a must-see for masochists

Sprawling, baffling and unwieldy, the play punishes everyone who gets involved with it: actors, directors and play-goers

Outstanding: Anna Maxwell Martin (Regan) and Simon Russell Beale as Lear [Getty Images/Shutterstock/iStock/Alamy] 
issue 01 February 2014

Directors appear to have two design options when approaching a Shakespeare tragedy. Woodstock or jackboot. Woodstock means papal robes, shoulder-length hair and silver Excaliburs gleaming from jewelled belts. Jackboot means pistols, berets, holsters and submachine-guns. Sam Mendes sticks the jackboot into King Lear in an attempt to find ‘a modern understanding of the story’, as he puts it.

What this ‘modern understanding’ reveals is that Shakespeare’s opening scene allows the dramatic focus to move between the personal and the political with invisible fluency. Mendes destroys this asset by laying on a televised show trial. Lear’s daughters, surrounded by scowling commandos, are arraigned at miked-up tables as if accused of treason. The intimidating atmosphere leaves no room for the weird intimacy and hypocrisy of the family drama to unfold. When Cordelia’s speech infuriates Lear, he overturns two of the chunkiest tables (rather too easily for a man of 80), and the crash-bang-wallop of flying furniture kills the great line, ‘Come not between the dragon and his wrath!’

This production enjoys experiments.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in