Earlier this week, Chris Skidmore and Sadiq Khan announced they were ‘teaming up’ to defeat the politicians they believe are attempting to thwart climate action. In an article for the Guardian, the duo has put aside political differences to ‘set an example’ of what is possible. Those differences could be disputed: the Conservative member for Kingswood is further to the left than many MPs on the Opposition benches. But it was by no means the most dubious claim in their piece.
Consider, for instance, Khan’s assertions over Ulez, London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone. He repeats that it was brought in to prevent premature deaths and illness, though it seems more likely that it was designed to plug the £3 billion hole in Transport for London’s finances the Mayor created by freezing fares early in his tenure. His claim that the policies in the ‘London Environment Strategy’ (including Ulez) will reduce new incidences of disease by 300,000 and prevent 4,000 pollution-related deaths a year in the capital, has been widely disputed.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in