Andrew Lambirth

Russian danger

Rodchenko and Popova: Defining Constructivism<br /> Tate Modern, until 17 May

issue 18 April 2009

Rodchenko and Popova: Defining Constructivism
Tate Modern, until 17 May

Art is always at its most dangerous — but perhaps also its most endearing — when it approaches the idealistic. In the wake of the Russian Revolution of October 1917, the group of artists who called themselves Constructivists came to believe that abstraction could transform everyday life. But, unlike many theorists, they weren’t content simply with the idea of art’s revolutionary potential, they longed to put it into practice, and this they proceeded to do. Abstraction is a great tool in applied art, and the Constructivists used it to good effect in posters, books, textiles and furniture. For once, art had a use. It became an instrument of social change, and utilitarian Constructivism for a time led the way in Revolutionary Russia. But only for a time. Pretty soon, its perceived lack of humanity told against it.

This exhibition is dedicated to two of the leading protagonists of 1920s Russian Constructivism, a movement that grew out of the construction of abstract reliefs from found objects, inaugurated by Vladimir Tatlin.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in