In her memoirs, Raisa Gorbacheva recalls the moment when her husband turned from bureaucrat into reformer. ‘I’m in my seventh year of working in Moscow,’ he told her as they were walking together one evening. ‘Yet it’s been impossible to do anything important, large-scale, properly prepared. It’s like a brick wall – but life demands action. No, we can’t go on living like this any more.’ It was the first time, she wrote, she heard him say such words. ‘That night, a new stage began that brought big changes.’
Mikhail Gorbachev’s death this week has led to much analysis of his legacy. He is admired more in the West than in Russia. When he won the Nobel Peace Prize, his critics drily noted that it was not the prize for economics. While countries in eastern Europe reclaimed statehood and obtained democracy and prosperity, Russia slid into anarchy and gangsterism. The results of this failure lie before us now: there is war in Europe once again, energy prices are surging, and millions fear a winter of misery and penury.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in